Background

Dane received his MBA from the University of Oregon before starting a 17 year career at Boeing managing software development projects and teams. After leaving Boeing, he founded his own aviation software company. When COVID hit, he sold the company after 6 years, but continues to consult with the company that purchased it.

In 2020, Dane and his wife Stephanie sold their house in Sherwood and moved full-time to their beach house in Rockaway Beach. After moving to Rockaway Beach, Dane became a licensed General Contractor and has been building houses ever since. While quite a departure from aviation software development, he has enjoyed getting out from behind a computer and building things.

In his spare time, he and Stephanie spend as much time as possible on the ocean fishing in their boat Game Changer. His other hobbies include racing sailboats and camping.

He has also been on the board of directors of both clubs and non-profit organizations as well as the Port of Garibaldi Budget Committee.

Why would I want to be Mayor?

When you see things that just don’t seem right, you either ignore it or do something. While I have heard lots of rumors about there being factions in our town, until the last year or so I hadn’t paid a lot of attention. It seems the current mayor and council make policy that they and their like-minded group wants. Comment periods where people get 3 minutes each to give testimony followed almost immediately by a vote that is obviously already decided, is not the job of the Mayor or council. I want to see committees made up of diverse groups of community members, picked based on their applications – not cherry picked. We need people on committees that have different opinions to bring all different perspectives to decision making.

As a contractor, I have also seen inconsistencies in interactions with the city. If I can influence bringing consistency and transparency to our city government, I will.

What it comes down to, I am passionate about our little beach town. We chose Rockaway because of its beach-town feel, and I would love to help contribute to us keeping that charm.

What I promise

I will listen and take into account the needs and perspectives of all Rockaway Beach stakeholders including local businesses, visitors, second home owners, and residents. Elected officials should be taking into account all stakeholders, not just their like-minded circle. It’s not about what “I” want, it’s about two things – what does the majority of the city want and what’s best for Rockaway Beach.

I believe we need more community driven committees that work on solutions to important issues. Committees need to be made up of people who have a diverse set of views on the issues being worked. There also needs to be a fair way for people to submit an application to be on committees so we can get multiple points of view. Stacking a committee with people who all believe one thing isn’t useful. Finding people with a passion on each side of an issue will result in compromises to come up with recommendations. Finally, the council using those recommendations when making policy is key.

An example: STRs. We should have an STR committee made up of people who don’t want STRs, have STRs, someone representing the business community, maybe a real estate agent, etc. They should be looking at all the issues and advantages of STRs, evaluating real data, outlining possible solutions for the issues, etc. They will not agree going in (or even 100% at the end), but it’s amazing what happens when you get people with different perspectives communicating that and then looking at the other perspectives objectively…. recommendations that compromise but address issues. Putting together a committee of people who all have STRs, or who all don’t want STRs because they don’t want visitors in our town, would be a worthless exercise – it would just result in a pre-determined answer.

What are my priorities?

While there are lots of things going on in Rockaway, all of which are important and many will drive the future of Rockaway, here are a few of my priorities if I’m elected;

  1. Ensure our Rockaway Beach city government embodies honesty, transparency, and consistency!
  2. Lead the effort to address affordable/workforce housing
  3. Support our Emergency Services, including a close look at the feasibility of bringing back our police department
  4. Businesses and the city working together – main street is critical to small towns, and Rockaway Beach is no different
  5. Parks and Rec – I believe there is a big gap here that we can fill
  6. Removal of seat numbers for city council seats on the ballot in front of voters
  7. Make sure we do not lose our 4th of July Fireworks Show

For all of these issues, I’d like to see more input and involvement from community members through more committees AND the city council/government taking those recommendations seriously. I also believe getting various stakeholder groups represented on those committees (not stacking them with like-minded individuals) is critical to their success.

What are my priorities if I’m elected?

Long-term housing

This issue is a passion of mine. I am a firm believer we need more long-term housing options, both for people who currently live here and workers for our businesses. The current Mayor and City Council have not done one substantive thing to help encourage expansion of more long-term housing. The only thing they have done is written into the short-term rental cap that it is “To address the interests of the community, including vacationers, property owners, and neighbors, and to address the need for workforce housing in our community”, even some of them have admitted capping short-term rentals will not have an impact on workforce housing availability and cost. There is no evidence or research supporting the notion that a cap on short-term rentals will increase affordable workforce or longer-term rentals. Here’s a little more on what’s driving long-term rental rates. If this is important, why haven’t they done one thing AT ALL to move this needle?  Good question, clearly not a priority for our current Council and Mayor.  More importantly, any of the policy changes outlined below will take time and by not addressing it at all, any chance of making an impact pushes further out into the future. It’s not like all of a sudden there will be new housing options even after changes are made, it takes time for funding, design, permits, building (especially going into the Winter season).

There are a number of policy changes that can be made to encourage more long-term rentals. I will push for substantive changes to help along this front. First, we need different types of housing.

  • ADUs: Accessory Dwelling Units (a livable unit with an existing house) is a great way to create more long-term housing that’s more affordable. It can also help home owners pay their mortgages with some income. The city currently discourages ADUs by charging a separate SDC (System Development Charge) of over $15K to connect to their existing water and sewer. This makes the cost to build an ADU not really worth it, it will take more than a year just to pay back the SDC charge, let alone the cost to build the ADU. I will push to waive the SDC fees for ADUs with the stipulation it can never be used as a Short-term rental.
  • Encourage Duplex and Triplex units. Like ADUs, currently each unit requires a separate SDC even though it is served by a single service. The only reason for this would be to discourage building this type of housing, which makes no sense. With an extra $30K+ in SDC charges to build a triplex, a property owner/builder will do way better building a single family residential house which doesn’t bring more affordable housing. I will push to eliminate the SDCs for a duplex or triplex to encourage development.  I do believe the waiving of SDCs should also include some period of time at least it can not be used as an STR.
  • Other types of pre-built homes. There are some great park model/tiny homes that look just like houses but are built to RV codes not manufactured house code, so therefore they are not allowed based on our Rockaway Zoning. They are very reasonably priced and would provide much less expensive housing options. In addition, looking at being able to put more than one on a property would again make a big difference in density of long-term housing. I don’t believe they should be able to be STRs, so they would provide longer-term housing.
  • There are a ton of lots in Rockaway, many of which don’t have utilities to them. This makes building on those lots cost prohibitive. I would like to see the city investigate the ability to invest in providing the infrastructure to some of those areas to open up more buildable lots. It will result in SDCs and ongoing service fees with new customers. Either the city can invest in the infrastructure or at a minimum provide the ability for land owners to pay for the infrastructure over a long period of time. This, along with the options above, more long-term housing that’s affordable is possible.
Fund and support Emergency Services

I firmly believe we need to continue to support and fund our fire department and emergency preparedness. They are doing a great job and are critical to Rockaway. Just as important, we need to evaluate the feasibility of bringing back our police department under local control. I am positive it won’t be easy, however the simple fact is the city council sold us a bill of goods that we would “get better coverage at less cost” by outsourcing to the County. Well, I can say without a doubt, we do not have better coverage. I am also confident there is no way outsourcing would be cheaper if we did have better coverage.  When we purchased our house in Rockaway it was very reassuring that we would see officers driving by several times a day just keeping an eye on things. I rarely see one drive by in the past couple years. At the last city council meeting, the TCSO update indicated that much of the last month we have had at most one officer due to Tillamook County staffing the County Fair, vacations, etc. This is not where we need to be for community safety, and it has been several years since the council disbanded the police department.

I see no reason we can’t have a Police Department that is as good as our Fire Department!

Businesses / Chamber / City work together

Mainstreet is the heart of Rockaway Beach. Our local businesses make Rockaway the beach town it is, and are critical to support our full-time residents year-round. The Chamber does a great job promoting Rockaway with volunteers. Finally, the city government needs to support both. If this triangle works together, our little town will thrive!  My goal is to get everyone working together. While I don’t have the history here, which maybe is good, I do know the goals of all three should be very well aligned. It seems like there is a lot of us vs them, even when goals are aligned. I hope to be able to bridge that divide.

Parks and Rec

I do think we need more opportunities for newer residents and long-term residents to get involved in activities together, and a Parks and Rec department (as Rockaway had in the past) would be a great step in the right direction. Having moved to Rockaway Beach full-time just a few years ago, I can say it is hard to get to know people and find activities to participate in. More opportunities to get involved in community events and activities to meet people would be great for everyone. Both more recent residents and folks that have lived in Rockaway a long time can benefit. While I don’t know exactly what this looks like yet, it is a perfect opportunity for a committee to help define what’s important with Parks and Rec.

Numbers off council seats

I will champion putting to the voters the option to update our city charter to permanently remove the city council seats. They were not on the ballot for 70 years and showed up out of nowhere in 2014. No one can show how they got there. They just don’t make sense with such a small town, no one should win a seat unopposed while voters have to pick between candidates for another seat. It takes the decision away from voters and randomly puts it on which seat a candidate is running for. Let the voters pick the best candidates and the top vote getters get the open seats. There is nothing good about seat numbers for voters, period. The only people benefitting from the seat numbers are those running unopposed or picking which candidate they want to run against.

Short Term Rentals

This is an inevitable question, what is my stance on Short-term rentals?

First, I 100% believe STRs need to be regulated and our existing very reasonable rules enforced. In fact there are some areas where our STR rules can be improved. It feels like enforcing our regulations for STRS should have been the first step vs going straight to a cap. My biggest issue with the STR cap was the fact everyone knew it was a pre-determined decision by our council, not based on any facts, feedback, community involvement, etc. Even knowing that, there was a lot of testimony against a cap at the city council meeting. I would have expected the city council to lay out all the issues to be solved and what actions would address those problems. Instead they went straight to a cap that would be a silver bullet, which it isn’t.

I do know STRs support a lot of our tourists, which are critical to our local businesses and economy. All of us that live here rely on our local businesses to eat and shop, so we should care about their strength. While cities throughout Oregon and the country for that matter struggle every year to create a balanced budget, we actually have money to invest. That is only possible due to TRT (STR) tax, which accounts for a significant portion of our city income (from the Rockaway Budget it looks like our TRT income is more than double all other income sources combined).  We have the lowest property tax rates on the North Coast Tillamook County, less than 1/2 that of Tillamook, Nehalem, Bay City, Wheeler, and Garibaldi and less than Manzanita. Again, this is largely possible because of the TRT.

Houses that are not full-time residents are either STRs or second homes. Many of the houses around town are second homes, which remain empty a good portion of the time. I know around our house (we are 5-6 blocks from the beach), more than 1/2 of the 10 closest houses are second homes. It’s hard for me to believe that it’s better for our town to have more second homes that sit empty instead of STRs that bring people to our town, and the reality is Rockaway Beach is a very desirable place to have a beach house (second home).

I do understand that there are folks who would prefer not to have tourists in our town, and would rather have our little beach town to ourselves. That is not me, we bought a house here and ultimately moved here full-time partly because of the vibrant resort town feel. We knew Rockaway has been a resort town for over a century, and embrace that. Of course we want our town to be a great place to live as well, so balancing the two is critical.

What it comes down to is I believe that both the pro-STRs and anti-STRs have valid concerns. Certainly when an STR (or, frankly, any house) becomes a nuisance our ordinances need to be enforced and there must be consequences. That doesn’t seem to have been the case in Rockaway.

I believe that a thorough process of identifying the issues STRs present, listening to stakeholders both about what issues are and solutions to address them, actually understanding the numbers and consequences of both a cap, no cap, and the cap # would provide a methodical way to wholistically address STRs. There is more work to do, the cap was a knee-jerk reaction and driven by a desire to have less tourists in town. A cap may be the right thing, the number may not be (there was no justification for the cap number, it was pulled from thin air), or it may have a significant impact on local businesses, TRT, etc. I would like to see a committee of folks representing different viewpoints on the issue be appointed to do this analysis and make recommendations – and most importantly the city council listen and use those recommendations.

A great example of policy that encourages the right things, which we should be doing, was pointed out by a Citizen at the City Council meeting 10/9. Whether you like the cap or not, an idea of exempting STRs from the STR cap is brilliant! This really would encourage STR owners to make their homes ADA compliant, which would make our city even more inclusive.

Questions from Pioneer “forum”

Many of the questions that were sent by the Pioneer included commentary and opinion framed as “context”, not just questions. For those questions I have pulled out the actual question without the commentary and just answered the questions here along with the good, straight up questions.

 

1 – Give us a SWOT analysis of Rockaway Beach – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

Wow, great question – haven’t done one in a a number of years. This should be a living document with continual improvement. I will add this when I can spend a little time to do it right. Hard one to write off the top of your head. Adding all of the candidates together probably will create a great SWOT analysis.

 

2 – How can Rockaway Beach manage the impacts of climate change – loss of beachfront, buildable lands – rising sea levels, erosion? What is your view of adding rip or armoring the beachfront?

As with any city or person for that mater, the city should do their part. It’s a tough one, though, as we are in more of a reactive position at this point. I certainly don’t have a silver bullet. As specific issues arise such as rising sea levels, erosion, etc. we will need to assess and adapt for sure. That’s a continual process as things change. As for rip along the beach front, I don’t know enough technically to say it’s good or bad. I would definitely rely on experts for that decision – we should not be allowing rip on one property if it is going to affect other properties and need to understand the chain reaction of any decision. Need to balance people losing their homes as well. It is definitely complicated. I don’t think there is one simple answer to the question that fits every situation.

3 – What is or should Rockaway Beach doing to prepare for the Cascadia event?

I believe our Fire Department and Emergency Preparedness group are doing great things to start that process and get us ready for an emergency. One of the biggest concerns I have is what to do about folks that don’t have the mobility to leave. My understanding is that Rockaway has done a neighborhood mapping exercise multiple times over the years (before my time) and has just been let die when new leadership comes in. I really think this is critical for there to be an understanding of of who lives where, who is here full-time, who might need help evacuating, etc. I do think that the city should be looking at what we could do to arrange for help for those folks during an evacuation.

4 – Do you or your family members own an STR or work for an STR management company?

Yes, we own two STRs. We manage them ourselves and have never had an issue with a guest. I cover my views on STRs extensively on my page above.

5 – STR licensing fees are a barrier to some residents. They allow the rich to get richer while cutting off an opportunity for others. What will you do to create a more equitable situation here?

That is a great question. I guess the first thing is to figure out the STR Cap situation. I have an extensive writeup above on STRs. I agree with you, the fees are pretty steep. That was intended by the current council to discourage people from getting an STR license, but what it accomplished was discouraging people that can’t afford to pay $500 every year just to keep an STR license active to keep their property value. The cap definitely created a have/have not situation. I’m not sure I have a perfect answer for that question, this is where we NEED an STR committee made up of people who don’t want STRs, business owners, STR owners, etc. to look at all sides of this issues (licensing, rules, fees, pros of STRs, issues created by STRs, actual real numbers, etc.) and come up with solutions/recommendations.

6 – A lot of businesses reported that this year was “just okay” – we had lots of visitors, but not a lot of “spenders.” What can Rockaway Beach do to support our businesses?

If that is actually true (people are spending less per visit, which is the implication) I suspect it’s largely due to the cost of things. I think we have all felt that, an avg hamburger is $15-18. Rockaway is a destination because it’s a great staycation location. I really believe there are opportunities for our Chamber, city, and businesses working together to drive not only visitors to the city but visiting our businesses. First step is getting people here, so that’s great (can’t spend money if there isn’t anyone in town) that it was busy. I think there are some cool opportunities to give incentives to visitors (and locals for that matter) to frequent our businesses. Visit a business and get a stamp. Some prizes or discount if you get x stamps. Just throwing one thought that comes to mind – but it will take our community working together to make something like that happen. I do think the city should be looking at how to get people here year-round. More year-round events. Right now businesses rely on a few months to make up for losses during the winter (or some just close up shop and go on vacation during the winter) – that’s not a great recipe for success. If we can get more visitors year-round, businesses can even out their income, and keep people employed.

7 – There are lots of “for sale” signs along 101 – What is being done to encourage more businesses in Rockaway Beach?

While the city doesn’t have a lot of ways to be directly involved in getting businesses into those storefronts, it won’t happen if we aren’t business friendly. It really is something that I would like to help facilitate if at all possible. It definitely makes our town look sad with empty storefronts. First and foremost the city being business friendly and supporting visitors year-round is key to encouraging businesses to come to Rockaway.

8 – The City of Rockaway Beach is modestly small, yet it has to contend with two unharmonious business associations. The lack of communication, and willingness to communicate, across these associations cannot be good for the city. It also resulted in a rather confusing situation of having two Santa’s appearing at last year’s Christmas Tree Lighting.  As mayor what could you do to try to bring back harmony and balance to a single united business association?

I would meet with both and try as hard as I can to get a coordinated effort on behalf of Rockaway Beach. I don’t have the background or history to understand where this all comes from, it seems really strange to me, but if the businesses, chamber, and city work together it’s a force multiplier!  I would start by listening to both sides and try to bring them together by finding the common ground. I really believe businesses would be more successful working together along with the chamber and the other way around. The goals are so much aligned, the chamber promotes tourism and the businesses absolutely rely on tourists to make a living.  I will be honest, it feels like at some point there was a disagreement on an idea or plan and one group said I’m taking my toy to this other sandbox and things have just spiraled. I firmly believe it’s never too late to reconcile and do what’s best for everyone!

9 – What are the pluses and minuses of reintroducing the Parks and Recreation Department and/or the Rockaway Beach Police Department that were previously eliminated.

I cover both of these on my page above, but to sum it up we currently have TRT funds dedicated (as I understand it it is actually done so in an ordinance) to Parks and Rec. That money should only be used for Parks and Rec. To say we don’t have budget for it is misleading, and I question if Rockaway is legally using those dedicated funds as it is.

As for the police department, we were told when it was moved to the county we would get better service cheaper. No one can legitimately say we even have close to the coverage we had previously and I find it hard to believe we could have the same coverage cheaper by outsourcing. I have hired many many contractors over the years for my business, and there are advantages but cost is never one of them. The only way you could argue it’s cheaper is including coverage that the Sherriff’s Department already provided to Rockaway because it’s covered in their jurisdiction. They need to cover their costs for dedicated resources to Rockaway, so we are going to pay that cost.

10 – How would you respond to the statement “Current city government excludes or does not listen to all citizens, that ALL citizens do not receive equal treatment, and that “genuine citizen engagement” is missing from the current administration. Can you give an example of one of these instances in which ALL voices may not have been heard?

I left this question even though it was directly targeted at a couple candidates. How I would respond is that just go watch the September City Council meeting. The council passed 2 ordinances, the first comment period was a few minutes before the ordinances got voted on and then the mayor read the ordinance twice back to back (by name only, meaning he just read the name of the ordinance twice) and then voted on it. I find it hard to believe anyone believes they are genuinely considering that public input given minutes before voting, and that they don’t already know how they are going to vote before anyone testifies. You can see it here

If they really care about community input, where are community committees? What’s the process for applying to a committee? How do they evaluate applications and select candidates?

I will commit that to work to create committees for important Rockaway issues and topics, have an application process that is 100% transparent, and have a defined selection process by the whole council (not just me selecting people that agree with me or I like – that defeats the whole point). Some obvious places I think committees are warranted; STRs, Parks and Rec, City Appeal (maybe not best name). I am sure there are many other areas where a committee will make sense. Most importantly, taking that input and using it! Committees will not be just for lip service, their suggestions and input will be used as primary input to policy if I have any say in it.

11 – Several opponents of incumbents have stated that part of their platform is to promote ADUs as a solution to the lack of adequate housing in Rockaway. In fact, the city already permits ADUs, and ADUs are being encouraged throughout the county. All jurisdictions have claimed that our utility services (water, electric) are too small to be able to afford to waive system development charges (SDC) charges for ADUs, like Portland has done. Do you envision any other ways to incentivize and facilitate building of ADUs in Rockaway?

I would say that a statement that it is impossible isn’t true. Rockaway has one, if not the highest, SDCs on the North Coast. That statement would just be an excuse as to why nothing has been done to date. The city needs to INVEST in policy that encourages the desired outcomes (investment is not free). This is one such case. You can add onto your house a couple bathrooms and kitchen, no problem, with no new SDCs since you are on the same service. There is no difference between that and adding an ADU.  You can have one huge 5 bath house, and next door a 1 bath house and both pay the same SDC fees. This is not about money, it’s about policy. The reason this hasn’t been done yet is to continue discouraging ADUs.

What other incentives make up for an additional $15K+ to build an ADU on top of the cost to build it? Good luck. At $1,000 a month you would need to rent that ADU for over a year just to recoup the SDC fee, not covering any of the actual cost to build it or any return. It’s not financially a good move for anyone. They could rent for $2k a month and only take 6 months to pay the SDC fee back so they start paying back building the ADU, but that pretty much eliminates the point of ADUs as affordable housing.  People need to be able to make it an investment.

I also have other ideas (above) on ways to encourage more affordable housing as well.

12 – In campaign literature, social media, and websites, it would appear that most of candidates’ goals are either identical or very similar to goals of the current incumbents. These all sound great—but what distinguishes you from your opponent(s)?

I suppose the difference is my passion around housing, and dedication to getting the community meaningfully involved in solving problems and making decisions for US. It is not about what I want, or my friends want, it’s about what Rockaway Beach wants and what’s best for the city. As someone said the other night, which I really like, if no one is 100% happy then it’s probably a good sign. It means there has been compromise to get to good policy and decisions.

Questions for Dane

Thank you for checking out this blog. This is an opportunity to post questions for me to answer. Below are questions that were asked to me at the Meet and Greet on 10/5, most of which there wasn’t time to answer, so I am answering them here. Please ask questions in a comment and I will answer those questions. I think it’s important for folks to be able to ask questions and find out more about my thoughts.

Question 1: Address the fact that the Mayor is a non-partisan position and share your thoughts on how you believe your own personal “partisan” beliefs vs your role as Mayor in a non-partisan position?

First, I believe that the issues confronting Rockaway Beach are non-partisan in nature to begin with. I don’t think it matters what party you belong to, Rockaway Beach issues are our own and have Rockaway solutions.  To me it’s all about getting the community, with different backgrounds and viewpoints, working together to come up with solutions that make sense. I truly believe you get a group of people working together that have different beliefs, backgrounds, viewpoints and opinions you get creative solutions that land somewhere in the middle. It’s no longer an us vs them, but we need to come up with ideas and solutions that we can all live with. I spent a couple decades working on cross-organizational teams (across offices, states, and countries) where the only way to get things done was to work together to come to common solutions. All that said, I don’t fit nicely in any party – I always consider each issue on its merits not what any party platform says makes sense.

Question 2: Please speak to the issue raised in our community’s social media that married couples both serving city government should “be a concern”?

I can certainly see why this question would come up, of course I’ve asked myself does it make sense. The one thing I can say is while we both have the best for Rockaway Beach at heart, we don’t always agree with each other and certainly will challenge each other when we don’t. Since the Mayor position does not have a vote, I do not think it poses a risk of the ability to push forward any particular action even if that was a concern. I guess I would ask you to look at what we both stand for and make your decision based on that. If you feel like only one of us should be in city government, I can also respect that and would suggest you seriously consider the most qualified candidate – Stephanie Winchester for City Council.

Question 3: Do you believe limiting STRs will help with the need for affordable housing? Why? OR why not?

This is an area I am passionate about. I cover this pretty thoroughly above, but to answer the question, I am certain that limiting STRs will make no difference in availability and certainly the cost of long-term housing. The cost of long-term rentals is a reflection of the cost of real estate and the cost to build. I do believe there are policy decisions that can result in more affordable housing options, and the city council has done nothing toward that end. Most importantly, by not doing anything it is exacerbating the housing crisis as there will be a lag in seeing results from policy changes – it’s not like any change will all of a sudden result in more housing,

Question 4: What is your stance on seat #s vs block voting? And why?

I am absolutely opposed to numbers on seats for the city council. I think this is terrible for the voters of Rockaway – no councilor should get elected unopposed because of a number on a seat while other councilors run against several candidates. Seats were added after almost 70 years of n seats with no vote or any other official action, and it is to the detriment to US the voters. I will work to make sure this gets put in front of voters to choose, what do they want! There are several areas of our city charter that I believe need updating and the voters need a say in that.

Question 5: What differentiates you from our current Mayor?

The thing that differentiate me from the current Mayor is that I will represent all stakeholders in Rockaway Beach, not my like-minded circle. My job as mayor isn’t to get what I want, it’s to LISTEN to the people of Rockaway Beach and push for win-win solutions. I am dedicated to getting more committees formed to address key Rockaway Beach issues with community members that have opinions on all sides of the issues. They will not be hand picked people on the committees with the same viewpoints, it defeats the purpose. People will apply and be selected based on what they bring to the discussion, one of those things is their differing opinions. You don’t get good solutions by having people that agree on a committee – you get the suggestions you want which again would not be my job as Mayor.

Secondarily, I will 100% support keeping our Fireworks show on the 4th of July, which the current Mayor has told people he would like to eliminate. I believe this is a great Rockaway Beach tradition – it’s great for our businesses, it’s great for second homeowners who come down with family and friends, and it’s great for the many residents that we watch bring down generations of family members and friends every year for the 4th of July to share their beach town (us included).

Update 10/8: the Mayor today has professed his love of fireworks shows and would never consider cutting the fireworks in Rockaway Beach. Well, fact is the council absolutely considered it (enough to directed the city to look into drone or laser light show as an alternative to fireworks in the October workshop reporting back in the November workshop). While the Mayor being a fan of our fireworks show is contrary to what I have heard from multiple sources, I stand corrected, and I say GREAT!  If he gets re-elected, hold him to his word that’s now in print and keep our Rockaway fireworks tradition alive. There were a couple councilors who made the practical point at the Nov workshop that there would be a lot of blowback if the fireworks went away and businesses have said it’s critical to them. They basically decided to table it to a future discussion. The Mayor did, however, say “virtually all the towns up and down the coast are shutting down their fireworks displays, we are one of the few cities that.[hard to understand but basically still has one]….” not in the context that it’s great for Rockaway that we are one of the last towns keeping the tradition alive.  What it comes down to, I will say I stand corrected and be happy that regardless of the election outcome our fireworks show seems to be safe.

By |September 30, 2015|1 Comment
Go to Top